So what then? Is the blind photographer (http://blog.blindphotographers.org) better then the institutionalised photographer? Probably not because hey they can't really see shit... better than me no doubt... but looking at Steichen and his lot (pictorialists) they were doing something that they were drawn towards.. Romantic notions though they were... I can't get away from the idea that photographers should be cut loose from the dogma of the image and instead reflect what they see everyday.. What else can photography do? Its not going to influence people (apart from buying shit that is) is it?
People are going to read imagery from the perspective of the whole package of images they carry with them, we don't see something without wanting to put in a place alongside other things we feel it belongs with.. We do this with out even having to think about it.. But isn't it great when we actually see some thing that actually pricks us and makes us smile because we simply don't know where to put it...
Friday, April 29, 2011
imitation is the highest form of flattery
The Pond—Moonrise, 1904
Edward Steichen
So what I’m talking about here i think is the photographers desire to be original but that we are taught to study other work and be able to reference it and to have a knowledge of the various movements within the institution of photography/art.. But why? If I think about it we get this huge body of work which we are always ripping off and passing off as our own.. If photography is the tool of modernity and the new, why then are we still homaging images over one hundred years old.. is art just a copy of a copy of a copy etc... I don't think its necessarily bad that we look back and become influenced by the stuff that precedes us, but the knowledge of that stuff (stuff here I mean photographs hereby referred to as stuff) works against the idea of learning and exploring the world photographically.. I always feel the need looking at stuff in galleries, that I want to be able to say 'yeah that like so and so' or 'that reminds me of your man' not ' cool thats funny'.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
this reminds me of your man i went to college with, except for the bit of self-deprecation.
and yes to the last question although it's even better when it makes me feel (numb fuck that i am), and rather than moves me makes me move.
Post a Comment